Which legal doctrine allows for the use of deadly force?

The doctrine that primarily allows for the use of deadly force is grounded in the concept of imminent threat. This principle suggests that the use of deadly force is permissible when an individual reasonably believes that there is a significant and immediate threat to their life or the life of another person. The threat must be of such nature that it requires an immediate response to prevent injury or death.

This doctrine emphasizes the need for a clear and present danger, where the potential for severe harm is imminent. In situations where there is a well-founded belief that an individual’s life is in jeopardy, the law recognizes the right to use lethal measures as a means of self-defense or defense of others.

To further elaborate, self-defense encompasses the broader legal framework that includes various circumstances under which force can be justified. However, it is the imminent threat that specifically triggers the circumstances justifying the use of deadly force, as opposed to other scenarios where non-lethal means may be deemed sufficient for defense.

In contrast, doctrines like reasonable force or proportionality focus more on the appropriateness and amount of force used in response to a threat, typically advocating for measures that are commensurate with the level of perceived danger. These doctrines do not unequivocally endorse deadly force but instead set boundaries on